Image via anh-usa.org |
Welcome to Part 2 of our GMO series. Last week we
discussed what GMOs are, how they are created, and how the creation process is different from natural selection. This week we are
focusing on how GMOs are regulated and how they got into our food supply to begin with.
How are GM crops
regulated for consumer safety?
Great question! GM crops aren’t subject to
safety standards or government regulation standards! Say what!?! How is a food
product not subject to safety regulations?? Unfortunately, science and
common sense were somehow blindsided in the early 90’s when the FDA issued a
“Statement of Policy” supporting Monsanto’s claims that the technology
used to create GMOs was no different than hybridization, which is why they do
not have to rigorously test their products for safety before putting them on
the market. In Europe, the burden of proof is on the company to prove their products are safe, but in the U.S. the burden is placed on the government to ensure safety. In the case of GM food products, something interesting happened, these biotech companies were given a hall pass and currently do not have to prove anything!! Crazy, right? Here is the FDA statement that made this possible, excerpted and explained from Genetic Roulette by Jeffrey Smith:
May 29, 1992
“Statement of Policy”:
“The agency is not
aware of any information showing that foods derived by these new methods differ
from other foods in any meaningful or uniform way.”
Image via santacruz.com |
Wait a second – didn’t we say in last week's post that there were memos
from FDA experts reporting the opposite? That they ARE different and that there are
different risks? The answer is YES! This argument is documented in
several memos and documents; yet, this 1992 statement resulted in the final
policy. It should make you wonder WHY they
made a policy supporting the opposite. Below is an excerpt explaining how this
simple Statement of Policy has changed our food system in a precarious way:
“This sentence in the 1992 FDA policy, which still stands
today, is the reason why GM crops are on the market. On the basis of this
statement, the FDA said no safety testing was necessary. If Monsanto or the
other biotech food companies say their foods are safe, the FDA has no further
questions…..”
Say what?! I’ll leave it to you to dig deeper, but the
information is out there on who let this happen, as well as their affiliation with GMO
biotech giants. Remember, this isn’t a political post, but now you are in "the know". Go fish!
I’m dying to know –
why GMO? How did GM food crops get started in the first place? How prevalent
are they today in our food supply?
GMOs began in the late 80’s in an effort to create tobacco
plants that were resistant to herbicides. They were later made insect resistant
too. As of August 2012, the FDA had approved 144 different GMO crops that are
either allowed for human consumption or for animal feed. You can find a list here to break it down:
GE Crop
|
# of FDA
approvals
|
Food
Product
|
Other Uses
|
Alfalfa
|
1
|
Seeds, sprouts,
leaf meal
used for fortifying baby food
and other special diet
foods
|
Animal
feed
|
Canola (rapeseed)
|
17
|
Cooking oil, mayonnaise, salad dressing
|
Animal
feed
|
Cantaloupe
|
1
|
Cantaloupe
|
|
Cotton
|
22
|
Cottonseed oil for fried foods
|
Cloth, animal
feed
|
Flax
|
1
|
Oil
as a supplement, meal
added to grain products
|
Animal
feed, cloth
|
Corn (maize)
|
38
|
Cooking oil, corn products,
corn,
corn syrup
|
Animal
feed
|
Papaya
|
2
|
Papaya, juice
|
|
Plum
|
1
|
Plum, jelly, jam,
canned plums
|
|
Potato
|
28
|
Potato, potato
chips, flour
|
Animal
feed
|
Radicchio
|
1
|
radicchio
|
|
Rice
|
2
|
Rice,
crackers,
cereal, flour
|
Animal
feed
|
Soybean
|
17
|
Cooking oil, tofu, soy sauce,
lecithin, soy nuts, soy milk, infant formula,
cereal products,
flour, soy protein, mayonnaise,
salad dressing
|
Animal
feed
|
Squash
|
2
|
squash
|
|
Sugar beet
|
3
|
Anything that
contains beet sugar
|
Animal
feed
|
Tomato
|
7
|
Tomato, tomato
sauce, paste,
ketchup, canned
tomato
|
Wheat
|
1
|
Flour
|
|
A recent report from the USDA shows approximately 93% of our
soy, 88% of our corn, and 94% of our cotton in the US was genetically
engineered. In comparison, when the crops were first being introduced to the market
in 1996, less than 10% of soy, 20% of corn, and 10% of cotton was genetically
engineered. That’s a HUGE shift! While not all of these crops are approved for
human consumption, many are, and the ones designed for animal feed still get into our food supply by way of meat, eggs, milk and mild products. We eat what our
food eats (you are what you eat…you get the gist).
Image via oregonculinaryinstitute.com |
A final key point I want to leave you with - Not only are GMOs present in our food supply both directly and indirectly, but GMO
animal feed changes the quality of the animal's tissue. Grain fed cattle have higher concentrations
of omega-6 and omega-9 fatty acids in their tissue, opposed to the higher
quality, essential omega-3 oils found in grass fed cattle. Let me
explain why this is important - our cell membranes are made up of omega-3 fatty
acids. When we don’t have enough, alternative fats are used in the cell
membrane, resulting in molecules (such as neurotransmitters) being unable to attach to their receptor sites. Can you see how
that would be REALLY, really bad? Even if your blood work does not show you as being deficient in the molecule, the fact of the matter is that if the molecule can’t get
into the cell, you’ll be deficient regardless (and some pathway for disease will
be triggered over time). So when I say GMOs negatively impact us at the
cellular level, this is exactly what I'm talking about!
Next week, we'll look at the types of GMOs out there, their
relation to disease, and how they impact the health of our children. The data
is out there – it’s just not mainstream yet. That's where I come in!
References for this series:
2 "Genetically Modified Organisms and the deterioration of health in the United States” N.L. Swanson, 4/24/2013, Seattle Examiner.com
3 A Samsel and S. Senef Glyphosate’s Suppression of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and Amino Acid Biosynthesis by the Gut Microbiome: Pathways to Modern Diseases. http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/15/4/1416
7 V. E. Prescott, et al, “Transgenic Expression of Bean r-Amylase Inhibitor in Peas Results in Altered Structure and Immunogenicity,” Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry (2005): 53
Shanna Wahlquist is a Certified Holistic Health Coach specializing in empowering women to adopt a sustainable and healthy lifestyle without “dieting” or feeling deprived, and supporting them in balancing their gut-mind-body relationship, which she believes is the foundation of every chronic disease and ailment. She is the mother of two toddlers, ages 4 and 2.5 years old; her happy place is in the ocean surf, and her guilty pleasure is red wine – especially if it involves a limo with a group of friends! Shanna found her path to holistic healing after discovering the benefits of vegetable juicing in February 2012, a journey inspired by her desperation to discover the cause of the sudden onset of recurrent chronic respiratory illnesses suffered by her children. She used that experience as a launchpad for a career change and ended up discovering her true authentic self and life’s purpose. She’s always had a passion for science, food, healing and stewardship, and has created a business where she can enjoy them all simultaneously while making a difference in the lives of her family, friends, clients and community. You can find her on facebook at “NourishingMySoul”, her blog at www.shannawahlquist.wordpress.com or her website, www.shannawahlquist.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment